‘That was our last option’: Archie’s family lose latest bid to stop end of life support

UK

Archie Battersbee’s parents have suffered a new blow in their bid to stop doctors ending life support for their brain-damaged son after a European court said it “will not interfere” with the decisions of UK courts.

The boy’s family had applied to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to intervene as they seek to postpone life-sustaining treatment being switched off for the 12-year-old.

But the Strasbourg-based court said it would not interfere with previous rulings by “national courts”.

His parents, Hollie Dance and Paul Battersbee, submitted the application to the court just hours before Barts Health NHS Trust was initially expected to withdraw life support at 11am today.

Archie's parents Paul Battersbee and Hollie Dance
Image:
Archie’s parents Paul Battersbee and Hollie Dance

It came after the pair yesterday lost a bid in the Supreme Court – the UK’s highest court – to keep it going.

His hospital treatment has continued today as Archie’s parents made their latest application – but they were not successful in their new bid.

The trust had said it would make no changes to his care until outstanding legal issues were resolved.

More on Archie Battersbee

The boy has been in a coma since he was found unconscious in April and is being kept alive by a combination of medical interventions, including ventilation and drug treatments.

Doctors treating the child at the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel, east London, believe he is brain-stem dead and say continued life support is not in his best interests.

But his family insist the treatment should continue, saying the youngster’s heart was still beating, and he had gripped his mother’s hand.

Archie Battersbee. Pic: Hollie Dance
Image:
Pic: Hollie Dance

In a statement, the ECHR said it would not grant an interim measure to continue treatment and declared the parents’ complaints “inadmissible”.

The statement added the court would only grant such requests “on an exceptional basis” and “when the applicants would otherwise face a real risk of irreversible harm”.

The family’s application did not seek for the ECHR to rule whether or not withdrawing treatment was in Archie’s best interests, but asked for his rights to be recognised under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Archie Battersbee. Pic: Hollie Dance
Image:
Pic: Hollie Dance

His parents claim that stopping treatment would be in breach of the UK’s obligations under Articles 10 and 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, and Article 6 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Children.

These international obligations say states must take all necessary measures to ensure disabled people enjoy equal rights, and that governments should do all they can to prevent the deaths of children and young people.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

CNBC Daily Open: Time to look at AI-adjacent plays
Man charged with trying to assassinate Trump on golf course
Inside one of the first all-female hacker houses in San Francisco
Decapitated and in disarray, Hezbollah and Iran must now decide to fight or back down
eVTOLs incoming: Market outlook reports 1,044 vertiports being planned globally by 2028

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *