Sky News’ correspondents give their views on Trump’s call with Putin

US

Donald Trump has promised peace talks and teased the prospect of ending the war in Ukraine but, in the background, there are potential complications.

Here’s what Sky News’ experts think about what America’s new military policy and these planned negotiations could mean for Russia, the US, and Ukraine – along with its aspirations to join its European allies in NATO.

A short-term win that risks rewarding Putin
by Mark Stone, US correspondent

In the Oval Office, President Trump refused to say that Ukraine is an equal member of the negotiation with Russia to end the war. That refusal marks the end of a remarkable day.

I think what we have seen over the day, from an American perspective, is the confirmation of a profound shift in American influence, power and footprint in Europe. A ground-shifting moment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump and Putin to ‘end Ukraine war’

The post-WWII principle of American leadership, of America as the leading protector of Western principles and Western territory, seems to have been deeply eroded, maybe abandoned.

For the first time, America has said that its priorities prevent it from being focused on Europe.

More on Donald Trump

The call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin is the first by a US president since Biden spoke to Putin in December 2021 – before the invasion.

Ukraine latest: Trump and Putin plan to meet

President Trump was effusive in how he framed the call which was an hour and a half long – it was positive and we’re told he sees Russia as a ‘great competitor and at times an adversary’.

We don’t know what President Trump said to President Putin, what he committed to him, what he didn’t. The US defence secretary certainly seems to have conceded some key bargaining chips to Russia – land, no NATO membership or protection for Ukraine.

Trump’s mission has been to stop the fighting. He might do that – a big short-term win for him to trumpet to the American people.

The concern in Europe is that it’s a short-term win; that it will reward Putin; that America’s retreat will weaken Europe and maybe leave Putin to fight another day.

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy meet at Trump Tower in New York City, U.S., September 27, 2024. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton REFILE - QUALITY REPEAT
Image:
Trump, who met Ukraine’s president in September, appears ready to concede to some of Russia’s demands. Pic: Reuters

Putin’s red lines on NATO expansion haven’t shifted
by Ivor Bennett, Moscow correspondent

We knew there’d be contact between the two leaders at some point but this is still a hugely significant moment.

It fires the starting gun on the negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, and it may prove a watershed moment for other matters too – NATO unity, Ukrainian sovereignty and Russia-US cooperation.

Ukraine seems to be the issue on which everything else hinges when it comes to Washington and Moscow resuming ties – unlock that and Trump seems to believe a relationship can blossom: “We each talked about the strengths of our respective nations, and the great benefit that we will someday have in working together”.

But at what cost? It’s a question Kyiv will be asking itself with trepidation.

Read more from Sky News:
British woman fatally shot in Texas
Europe needs to get serious about defence
Glee actress’ final words revealed

Donald Trump clearly wants to be remembered as the president who ended the war and healed the world, and it seems he’s even willing to travel to Moscow in order to make that happen.

For Bill Clinton and George W Bush it was a regular port of call, visiting five times and seven times respectively. Barack Obama came twice, but after his trip in 2013 for a G20 summit, the visits suddenly stopped. The reason – Russia annexed Crimea.

FILE - In this July 21, 2000 file photo, President Bill Clinton shares a light moment with Russian President Vladimir Putin before a Group of Eight meeting in Nago, Okinawa, Japan. In a series of interviews with American film director Oliver Stone being shown on U.S. television on Monday, June 12, 2017, Putin said that he inquired about Russia joining NATO when Clinton visited Moscow in 2000. (AP Photo/Vincent Yu, File)
Image:
In 2000, America – under Bill Clinton – had a better relationship with Putin. Pic: AP

So given everything that’s happened since then, it would be quite the coup for the Kremlin if Donald Trump did visit.

Russia’s so-called special military operation wasn’t supposed to end in negotiations, but the leader of the free world flying into Moscow on a peace mission? You can see how Russia could spin that as a victory over the collective West.

But that’s not to say that a peace deal will be easy.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

There’s one line in the Kremlin’s read-out of the call that makes you wonder. It reads: “President Putin, for his part, mentioned the need to eliminate the root causes of the conflict”.

When Vladimir Putin talks about root causes, he means NATO expansion.

That’s what he claims is the reason for the war in Ukraine. And stating this in the call with Trump suggests his red lines haven’t shifted – no NATO membership for Ukraine, and that Kyiv must withdraw its troops from the four Ukrainian territories Russia currently occupies.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

At just $9,140, is the 2025 Nissan LEAF the best new car deal in Chicago?
Extreme Arctic Warming Sees North Pole Temperatures Rise Above Freezing
How did family from Gaza come to UK on Ukraine resettlement scheme?
Trump to help spark a nuclear energy ‘renaissance,’ investor says
Hamas names three Israeli hostages it says it will release on Saturday

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *